At the City of Duncan Council Meeting on 4 February 2019, City of Duncan Mayor Michelle Staples announced that she had spent most of the day at a Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) Budget Meeting. The City of Duncan has one seat on the CVRD Board.
We know several Cowichan Valley Regional District residents who follow CVRD matters closely and we asked one of them for comment on the CVRD Budget and tax increases for 2019.
Here is that CVRD watcher’s response:
“The Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) is in the process of completing its property tax plans for 2019 and the CVRD is planning on a substantial tax increase for homeowners in the City of Duncan. Based on the average assessed value of a home in the City of Duncan, $335,625.00, Duncan homeowners can expect a property tax increase of $32.57 or 7.26 per cent in 2019 compared with 2018. That will bring the average tax paid to the CVRD by an average homeowner in Duncan to $481.29. That does not include the taxes that you will have to pay to the City of Duncan in addition to these CVRD taxes.
Those taxes are $11.29 and $7.53 respectively. Additionally, the “Solid Waste” levy went up $8.56, with most of the balance of the increase due to rising costs of running the Island Savings Center (ISC). [note: here is a link to the CVRD Island Savings Center Commission]
Currently, the average home in the City of Duncan, annually pays about $200.00 to subsidize the operation of the Island Savings Center, $75.00 to operate the solid waste facility [note: here is a link to PDF of the CVRD Solid Waste Management Plan, revised 24 October 2018 following the Municipal Election on 20 October 2018] and about $40.00 to operate the transit system. The balance of the $481.29 average tax bill is used to acquire park land, pay for CVRD administration, operate regional parks, and now to manage the regions water service and fund the affordable housing plans. “
In short, if you are a City of Duncan homeowner, the taxes you pay to the CVRD will increase significantly in 2019.
Here are the CVRD Bylaws 4201 and 4202 which were passed in the Ballot Referendum on 20 October 2018:
“CVRD Bylaw No. 4202 – Drinking Water and Watershed Protection Service Establishment Bylaw, 2018“, will allow the CVRD to annually requisition up to the greater of $750,000 or an amount equal to the amount that could be raised by a property value tax of $0.045050 per $1,000 of net taxable value of land and improvements within the service area to establish a service for the purpose of drinking water and watershed protection within the Cowichan Valley Regional District.
VIHA has played a definite role in creating this problem. It hands out free needles to intravenous drug users but had no definite plans to recover those needles and, in fact, has long denied there was a problem with discarded needles.
“Sometimes discarded needles are found in public areas,” the release stated.” Sometimes? Does VIHA really think we believe this extremely inadequate description of the problem? Discarded needles are found on our streets and in public places on a daily basis. That is far more than “sometimes”.
But while this program undoubtedly has beneficial effects in preventing or reducing diseases and infections which can be transmitted among intravenous drug users through sharing or re-using needles, the fact remains that many of the needles (commonly known as “sharps”) distributed locally to intravenous drug users through this program are not returned to VIHA or to the Needle Exchange for safe disposal.
Instead they are far too often being discarded on public streets and in public spaces where they present a public health hazard.
I think the City of Duncan needs to contact VIHA to discuss solutions to this problem or, at the very least, ways to reduce the number of used needles and syringes discarded on Duncan streets and public spaces. Any contact with VIHA would necessarily need to be done in cooperation with the CVRD and the Municipality of North Cowichan.
There are already efforts to collect these used needles and syringes. The Needle Exchange on Trunk Road is one part of these efforts.
Another example involves secure Sharps Disposal boxes, like the one on the photo at left taken in Duncan’s Centennial Park, into which used needles can be safely deposited.
The Needle Exchange also hands out portable sharps disposal containers, made of heavy duty plastic, which hold 10 used needles/syringes. A photo of a “Contaminated Sharps” container appears on the left.
The Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team recovered over 4400 sharps from local streets and public spaces in the month of August 2018 alone. While I commend the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team for removing these 4400 used sharps from public spaces, the very fact that it did so illustrates the nature and extent of the problem.
I went out with the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team one morning in August [2018]. It was an interesting experience.
One of the first stops was the park at the rear of the Cowichan Aquatic Center at 2653 James Street. Alongside an outdoor skate park immediately north of, and adjacent to, the Cowichan Aquatic Center parking lot we came across a site with discarded needles and other drug related refuse. The photo below shows the location of the site in relation to the Cowichan Aquatic Center and its parking lot.
We then went a few blocks west to a site on Duncan Street between James Street and Beverley Street. The three photos below show this site., which is near, and across Duncan Street from, the North Cowichan Fire Department South End Fire Hall at 5851 Duncan Street.
Note that the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team member shown in the photo is going into this site equipped with limited safety equipment; basically a pair of steel toed boots with a metal shank in the sole, a pair of gloves and a device with a long handle for picking up discarded needles and other items. He was working on his own and he told me that sites like this one are considered Hazardous Waste sites.
I was quite surprised to see a Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team member, working on his own, going into Hazardous Waste sites with very limited safety equipment. During my time working for a Crown corporation I served as an elected union rep and was involved in WorkSafeBC issues and a variety of workplace safety incidents and concerns. I know from personal involvement in unions and WorkSafeBC issues that a union would not tolerate workers going into Hazardous Waste sites, alone and without adequate protective equipment. Nor would WorkSafeBC. But that is what is happening here with workers under contract to VIHA.
The photo below shows some of the drug related refuse at this site. The blue plastic vials contained distilled water used to mix a heroin solution. The orange wrappers contained powdered Vitamin C which is mixed with the heroin solution as an anti-coagulant. These items are handed out to intravenous drug users by the Needle Exchange in Duncan.
After spending some time patrolling various sites in Duncan, we went onto Cowichan Tribes land and walked along the E&N Railway track between Trunk Road and Allenby Road. There are several encampments along this section of the E&N Railway track like the ones shown in the photos below.
The photo below shows the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team member I was accompanying investigating another site on Cowichan Tribes land near the E&N railway track.
It seems to me that there are some definite problems with this. The Vancouver Island Health Authority (VIHA) has a program to distribute sterile needles free of charge to intravenous drug users as a way of harm reduction. This makes sense.
But there doesn’t not seem to be an adequate plan to get these needles back again. Instead these needles are ending up being discarded on public streets and in public spaces.
The Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team picked up 4400 discarded sharps from local streets and public spaces in August 2018 alone. But while that is a commendable effort the fact that there were at least 4400 discarded sharps on public streets and public spaces illustrates the fact that there is a serious problem with discarded needles in public spaces.
VIHA provides financial support for the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team. The Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team members are going out to collect these discarded needles with little in the way of protective equipment. They are going into places which would typically be considered HazMat sites without any HazMat protective gear.
I asked the member of the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team whom I accompanied what he thought some solutions might be. His first response was that the most effective solution might be to start a program similar to a bottle depot which pays the intravenous drug users a small fee, say 5 cents, for each sharp they turn in to the Needle Exchange.
That makes some sense to me. People collect bottles and cans to return to the Bottle Depot for 5 cents per bottle or can so there could be a similar kind of program for sharps. But then what would happen if children started going out to look for sharps in order to collect cash for their return? That would create some unwanted public health and safety concerns.
But the bottom line is that the current VIHA harm reduction program is handing out free syringes to intravenous drug users and many of those needles are not being returned to VIHA for disposal. Instead they are winding up discarded on city streets where they pose the potential for causing harm to others. In August 2018 the Warmland Sharps Pick Up Team picked up over 4400 discarded sharps from local streets.
I think Duncan and other municipalities really need to have some serious discussions with VIHA about the problem of discarded sharps on local streets and how to reduce the problem.
Mark Anderson – Candidate for Duncan Council – 22 September 2018
Update – 5 October 2018:
Since writing the above post, I contacted the City of Duncan about this issue and received the following answers. My questions and the City of Duncan staff answers appear below:
Q. Has the City of Duncan had contact with Vancouver Island Health Authority (VIHA) regarding their practice of providing free syringes to intravenous drug users and VIHA’s programs to collect those syringes for disposal after use? If so, when? Has VIHA made presentations, reports or correspondence to the City of Duncan regarding the issue of discarded used syringes? If so, when?
A. Yes, representatives from VIHA, Dr. Hasselback, has presented to the Committee of the Whole on the
overdose crisis, which included mention of the harm reduction practice of providing free needles, on April 4,
2016 (link to minutes; link to presentation ) On May 1, 2016, Dr. Hasselback also attended a closed
Committee of the Whole meeting. On June 5, 2017, Mayor Kent provided a verbal update on the Overdose
Prevention Site and Sharps (link to minutes).
Q. Has the City of Duncan made representations, recommendations or suggests to VIHA on the issue of discarded syringes, collection of discarded/used syringes or related matters? Are any such communications between VIHA and the City of Duncan available to the public?
A. Yes, on June 6 correspondence was sent to VIHA, the following is an excerpt regarding discarded syringes:
“On behalf of Council, staff, and our community, I am writing this letter to apprise you of a situation, that
over the past year, has become a huge problem for the City of Duncan and surrounding area. I am
speaking of the proliferation of needles being discarded throughout our area. It is felt that part of the
cause is the manner in which needles are being distributed to drug users by the Vancouver Island health
Authority. These needles are being handed out in large numbers by the Margaret Moss Health Unit,
Duncan-Drug & Alcohol Counselling Services Clinic, Warmland Shelter, the Central Vancouver Island Harm
Reduction Services (CVIHRS – NARSF), the Duncan – MHSU Office, the Duncan ACT office, and Ts’ewulhtun
Health Centre, with no programs to encourage the self return of needles by users.
We understand from speaking with the various agencies that collectively approximately 10,000 needles
are being distributed each month in our area alone. Many of those used needles are being discarded in
the City’s parks, tossed into public washroom feminine hygiene products receptacles, eaves troughs river
banks, and on property owned by businesses and residents. Council is extremely concerned for the safety
of its employees, citizens, and particularly the children. ”
The City received a response from VIHA on June 27, which included the following:
“Reducing the number of inappropriately discarded sharps, and collecting and safely disposing of sharps is
a shared responsibility between health care services, community agencies, local government and
substance users. Island Health has been working, and continues to work with, all of these stakeholders to
strengthen sharps disposal processes. This includes a new contract with the Cowichan Valley Branch of
the Canadian Mental Health Association for sharps collection seven days per week for an initial period of
six months. This service will be in place before the end of June and is in addition to other sharps collection
activities in the Cowichan Valley, including designated drop-off locations, the installation of disposal units in targeted areas, and sweeps around the Warmlands facility.
These collection activities complement ongoing programs and awareness activities that encourage users
to collect and return sharps. This includes the provision of purpose-designed sharps disposal containers
that are supplied with new sharps when they are distributed, and awareness information for users on
how to responsibly handle and dispose of used sharps. As a result of these actions, Island Health is
confident the vast majority of sharps that are handed out are collected and returned for safe disposal.”
Note: I do not share the confidence VIHA has expressed in the last sentence of this response. I think Cowichan Valley municipalities will have take a collaborative approach to VIHA about this situation.
Mark Anderson – Candidate for Duncan Council – 5 October 2018
Would you like to leave a comment or question about anything on this post?
At the City of Duncan Council meeting on 21 January 2018, Council passed a Motion directing City of Duncan staff to draft a Controlled Substances Property Bylaw.
DuncanTaxpayers.ca supports the passing of a Controlled Substances Property Bylaw. Here is a post on DuncanTaxpayers.ca from the fall of 2018:
Since November 2017 there have been two houses in Duncan on which the RCMP has executed search warrants for drug related offences and which have been found to have significant drug related refuse inside the houses and outside on the surrounding property. These houses are: 454 Garden Street, on which a search warrant was executed on November 2017, and a house in the 1000 block of Trunk Road, on which a search warrant was executed on 5 September 2018.
Finally, on 29 March 2018, four months after the RCMP search warrant was executed on 454 Garden Street in November 2017, the City of Duncan retained a hazardous materials remediation contractor, Lakeside Property Maintenance, to clean up the exterior of 454 Garden Street.
I spoke with the owner of Lakeside Property Maintenance who told me that the company had employed a crew of five people wearing full hazardous material protective equipment to carry out the work on the exterior and grounds of 454 Garden Street. Lakeside Property Maintenance removed 5 five gallon pails full of used syringes from 454 Garden Street along with 30-40 cubic yards of other drug related refuse.
The $12,000 cost of the clean up has been charged to the property owner through the City of Duncan property taxes on the property. As of 18 September 2018 the City of Duncan has not been reimbursed for the clean up costs.
But the important issue here is about public health and safety. A hazardous waste site at 454 Garden Street near downtown Duncan, containing enough discarded used syringes to fill 5 five gallon pails, along with 30-40 cubic yards of other drug related refuse, was left unremediated for four months before the City of Duncan was able to retain a private contractor to clean it up.
Current City of Duncan Bylaws did not give the City of Duncan the authority to immediately clean up the site if the owner was unable, reluctant or unwilling to do so.
Clearly the City of Duncan needs a new Bylaw, or Bylaws, to allow the City to immediately clean up properties which have become drug related hazardous waste site. Allowing a hazardous waste site, like 454 Garden Street, to go unremediated for four months is simply unacceptable.
As you can see, many of these Bylaws were enacted in the period 2005-2007, when the problems were typically meth labs and marijuana grow ops. Many of these these Bylaws have been updated, or are in the process of being updated, to include fetanyl and opioids.
Paige McWilliam has told me that the City of Duncan has instructed its lawyers to research Controlled Substance Property Bylaws. But the City of Duncan does not currently have a Controlled Substances Property Bylaw.
If elected to City of Duncan Council, I will make it a priority of enact an effective City of Duncan Controlled Substance Property Bylaw as quickly as possible.
Note: Some sources have suggested that WorkSafeBC regulations cover these situations. They don’t!
I contacted WorkSafeBC about its procedure for designating a property as a Hazardous waste site and received the following response from Terence Little, the Director, of Corporate Communications.
Here is the WorkSafeBC response in its entirety:
“Hello Mr. Anderson,
Thank you for your request for information regarding sites that potentially contain hazardous materials. I have been in contact with our Prevention Division and received the following response to your question:
WorkSafeBC does not designate sites as HAZMAT sites. WorkSafeBC’s mandate is to enforce the Workers Compensation Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (OHSR). Within those provisions are requirements for employers to ensure the health and safety of their workers by assessing the risks at worksites and employing appropriate measures to ensure workers are protected from those risks.
The OHSR requires employers to have a documented Exposure Control Plan, which includes procedures for assessing hazards, including the presence of hazardous substances, at a worksite. This may include requirements for testing materials or environments for hazardous substances. When worksites are contaminated with a hazardous material of substance, the employer is required to ensure that workers have the appropriate training, equipment, and procedures to protect them from that risk.
In terms of limiting access to a work location, this may be done by WorkSafeBC, police agencies, or other regulators, based on their authority and mandate. In situations where work processes present a risk of serious injury, illness, or death to workers, The Workers Compensation Act gives WorkSafeBC the authority to stop work and prohibit worker access to that work location. WorkSafeBC may do this if testing has revealed the presence of hazardous substance but the employer has not taken the necessary steps to protect workers from that hazard. WorkSafeBC would cordon off the location and place a placard at the location with the details and time limit of the order. Limiting worker access to a worksite in this manner is not equivalent to declaring the location a HAZMAT site.
I hope that answers your questions. Please let me know if I can assist further.
Regards, Terence.
Terence Little Director, Corporate Communications | 604.279.7666
6951 Westminster Hwy, Richmond, BC worksafebc.com”
Agenda Item 5.1. – Kirsten Baillie, Development Manager Vancouver Island – BC Housing
That Council direct staff to include the potential development of an affordable housing project on City owned land in the upcoming strategic plan discussion.
Kirsten Baillie presentation to Duncan Council consisted of a PowerPoint presentation and Kirsten Baillie’s explanation of that PowerPoint presentation. Here is a link to the BC Housing – 21 January 2019 Presentation to Duncan Council. [note: PDF] The presentation lasted from 1803-1820.
“Housing continuum” see slide: The Housing Spectrum, page 2 of PowerPoint
“Housing Hub” – BC Housing working with developers and municipalities to help them gain access to low cost financing to build market rental housing.
PRHC – Provincial Rental Housing Corporation: it’s a branch of BC Housing
Key points:
The BC provincial Budget provides $7 billion to be spent on building housing over the next ten years under the Community Housing Program;
Community Housing Program funds not available until 2020 but BC Housing is encouraging municipalities to start planning now for Community Housing Program funding which will be available starting in 2020.
At this stage, BC Housing is not looking at specific site selection. Instead, it is encouraging municipalities to develop plans now so they can apply for Community Housing Program funding which will be available starting in 2020. [See “Role of the Municipality” page 7 in the PowerPoint.]
This motion calls for the City of Duncan to look at development proposals on land owned by the City of Duncan. For information purposes, here is a post on City of Duncan property potentially available for new housing which I put online during the election campaign in the fall of 2018.Councillor Bob Brooke asked whether Kirsten Baillie had CMHC Average Rents. She didn’t. There were no other questions. The Motion carried unanimously.
Agenda Item 5.2 – Amy Melmock, CVRD Economic Development Manager
Councillor Stacey Middlemiss had to leave the room because of a conflict of interest.
Councillor Carol Newington volunteered to act as liason. Councillor Jenni Capps as alternate. Motion carried. There was no discussion regarding the motion.
Our comments: Mayor Staples and some Council members have ties with, and/or are members of, community organizations which may be associated with Our Cowichan Communities Health Network.
Item 7.2 – Correspondence from Cowichan Community Action Team
Councillor Stacey Middlemiss had to leave the room because of a conflict of interest.
Mayor Staples wanted two Council members as liason to the Cowichan Community Action Team instead of the liason and one alternate requested. Mayor Staples wanted herself and Council Jenni Copps in these positions.
Item 8.1.2. – Yearly Ongoing Grant in Aid – Chamber of Commerce
That Council direct staff to determine a business licence based funding formula using the number of business licences issued in Duncan and North Cowichan (south end) for the grant in aid for the Duncan Cowichan Chamber of Commerce, for the Cowichan Visitor Information Centre, to be included in the 2019 financial plan (approximately $26,000);
And That Council direct staff to meet with North Cowichan staff and the Duncan Cowichan Chamber of Commerce to discuss the business licence based funding formula for the Cowichan Visitor Information Centre.
Councillor Tom Duncan noted there are approximately 5000 people in Duncan and 30,000 people in the Municipality of North Cowichan, yet the City of Duncan is paying the same amount (approximately $26,000/year) as the Municipality of North Cowichan is paying to subsidize the Chamber of Commerce. Councillor Duncan said the City of Duncan is having a problem paying half the annual cost of the Chamber of Commerce and suggested the Chamber of Commerce look at alternate funding sources like hotel taxes.
The Motion carried with no further discussion.
Our Comments: we agree with Councillor Duncan that this Ongoing Grant In Aid needs to be reviewed. But we don’t think hotel taxes are a good alternative option. We will be watching for future developments on this.
Cowichan Valley Performing Arts Foundation requested $1,000 for the Cowichan Kids Musical Instrument Library and $1,000 for the bursary program. Council granted $1,000;
Rotary Club of Duncan requested $250-$500 to be used as a live or silent auction item at the annual fundraising dinner. Council granted a one year parking pass with a value of $288;
Council rejected the following Grants In Aid:
Clements Centre requested $1,500 for hosting Community Living Fun Day.
Our Comments: At this time we cannot provide any commentary on the reasons some requests were accepted while others were denied.
Item 9.1 – Controlled Substances Property Bylaw
That Council direct staff to draft a Controlled Substances Property Bylaw to prohibit the use of land and buildings for the production, storage, trade, or barter of controlled substances.
This Motion passed unanimously.
Our Comments:We strongly support a Controlled Substances Property Bylaw for the City of Duncan. It was part of Mark Anderson’s election platform in last fall’s Municipal election campaign.
This site is in the Municipality of North Cowichan, near the Vancouver Island University campus, the Vancouver Island Regional Library, the Island Savings Centre and the Cowichan Aquatic Centre. The Municipality of North Cowichan will make the final decision on whether the temporary Women’s Emergency Shelter will be allowed at this location.
Here is a map showing the site of the proposed Women’s Emergency Shelter:
It must be noted, however, that the building being proposed for use as a Women’s Emergency Shelter is immediately adjacent to Wendy’s House, 2200 University Way, a children’s day care facility run by School District 79, which is also part of the StrongStartBC program.
The following photos show the proximity of the proposed Women’s Emergency Shelter to the day care facility at Wendy’s House.
It should also be noted that there have been two previous proposed locations for a Women’s Emergency Shelter, both of which were also adjacent to Day Care facilities, which were rejected by Duncan Council:
Here are some reports in the Cowichan Valley Citizen about the proposed Women’s Emergency Shelter sites in McAdam Park (November 2017 – January 2018) and at 540 Cairnsmore Street (September 2018) and the public opposition to a Women’s Emergency Shelter at those sites. It should be noted that both of these proposed sites were also adjacent to Day Care facilities.
Council Members Present at the Meeting – Mayor Michelle Staples; Council members Bob Brooke, Jenni Copps, Stacy Middlemiss. Councillor Garry Bruce was not physically present but “attended” the meeting by phone. Absent: Councillors Tom Duncan and Carol Newington.
This presentation consisted of Inspector Bear basically just reading through the highlights of the written Quarterly Update. It took about 13 minutes and there were no questions from Council and no discussion by Council.
BC Provincial Budget 2018 has allocated $1 billion for Child Care over next 3 years;
There is an Application deadline of 18 January 2019 for local governments to apply to the Province for planning funds of up to $25,000 per local government. These funds are to be used for planning Child Care facilities within local government jurisdictions;
Michelle Kirby encouraged the City of Duncan to partner with the CVRD and Municipality of North Cowichan to apply for $75,000 in planning funding. This $75,000 figure represents $25,000 per local government (3 local governments x $25,000 / local government = $75.000)
There is a Province of BC program for subsidizing local governments partnering with non-profit child care providers to supply child care in local government owned facilities.
No questions from Council. This presentation went from 1814-1830.
Following this presentation a motion was passed: That Council support partnering with the Cowichan Valley Regional District to submit an application to the UBCM Community Child Care Planning Program to undertake a child care needs assessment within the Cowichan region.
Here is a link to the CAO Report [note: PDF] presented at the meeting by the City of Duncan CAO . The key points of the CAO Report were:
Trans Canada Highway Boulevards
City Water Main Project
Cairnsmore Neighbourhood Plan – MacAdam Park Neighbourhood Open House
Meeting scheduled with BC Housing on grant applications for housing. [Note: given the attention to housing issues in the recent municipal election we will be following this topic closely. We will ask about the result of this meeting and post what we find.]
The CAO Report was only 4 minutes from 1839 to 1843. There were no questions from Council and no discussion by Council.
Other municipalities, including Langford and Cumberland, have done more research on this topic than has the City of Duncan. The City of Duncan staff wants to watch municipalities like Langford and Cumberland to see what happens in those jurisdictions before finalizing recommendations to Council on Cannabis retailing in Duncan.
Councillor Jenni Copps asked:
does this apply to existing businesses which might apply for cannabis retailing licenses or just to newly formed businesses? Answer: Nobody knows yet.
Public hearing required for each Temporary Use Permit? Answer: Undecided at this point.
Mayor Michelle Staples asked:
has City of Duncan had discussions with Municipality of North Cowichan, CVRD and Cowichan Tribes on Cannabis licensing issues? What happens if a proposed cannabis retail location in Duncan is within 150m – 400m of a jurisdiction border? Answers: Staff has had a meeting with North Cowichan, CVRD and Cowichan Tribes but nothing definite yet. Staff says there have been No agreements with other neighbouring jurisdictions yet on any matters relating to Cannabis retailing.
CAO Peter de Verteuil stated that City of Duncan staff recommendations on Cannabis retailing are in line with what other jurisdictions are doing. Queries about starting Cannabis retail operations in Duncan are coming from companies, not from individuals. Langford and Cumberland are ahead of Duncan on developing Bylaws on Cannabis retailing so Duncan can watch these other jurisdictions to see what happens there.
Item 8.0 was Unanimously passed by Council. Discussion of this item took place between 1844-1907
8.5 Cultural Connections Workshops – The Village Project: The Journey of Our Generation
This item asked Council to approve the following motion:
That Council approve sending all staff hired since January 1, 2016, and all new Council members, to the “Cultural Connections workshops” organized by Social Planning Cowichan at a cost of approximately $41.33 per person.
Mayor Michelle Staples had to leave the room during consideration of this motion because was, until very recently, the Executive Director of Social Planning Cowichan and is still a member of Social Planning Cowichan.
This motion was passed by Council. All present voted in favour; Councillor Garry Bruce voted against the motion.
Our comments on Item 8.5: Given Mayor Staples’ active involvement in Social Planning Cowichan [she was the Executive Director of Social Planning Cowichan until October 2018 and, as far as we know, is still an active member] we are very wary of any training being given to City of Duncan staff and Council members by Social Planning Cowichan. The fact that Social Planning Cowichan will be paid ($41.33 per attendee according to the Motion) by the City of Duncan to deliver this training workshop to City of Duncan staff and Council members is also a matter of concern to us. We will be following this closely.
8.6 Reports of Mayor and Council.
No Councillor reports.
Report by Mayor Staples: Raising Riel flag was done for Riel Day and she wants to continue this in future years; she recommends seeing a current Cowichan Valley Museum Museum display on Japanese internment during World war II, residential schools, racism, portrait of Simon Charlie.
Would you like to leave a comment or question about anything on this post?
One decision of note from this meeting: Mayor Michelle Staples has been appointed to Duncan’s seat on the CVRD Board with Councillor Tom Duncan as the alternate.
It is established practice to have the Mayor of Duncan representing Duncan at the CVRD Board. Bear in mind that the Municipal representatives on the CVRD Board of Directors get compensation of $600.00 every two weeks from the CVRD.
Here newly elected Cowichan valley Regional District Board has held its first two meetings. Here is the video of each of these meetings, as posted on the CVRD YouTube channel:
Here is the Special Inaugural Meeting of the new CVRD Board on 7 November 2018:
Here is the Regular Meeting of the new CVRD Board on 14 November 2018:
The 20 October 2018 Municipal Elections featured two Referendum questions placed on the ballot by the Cowichan Valley Regional District. The two questions asked voters whether they approved CVRD Bylaw 4201 and Bylaw 4202.
Both these Bylaws passed in the Referendum. DuncanTaxpayers.ca was opposed to both both Bylaw 4201 and 4202.
But now that both Bylaw 4201 and 4202 have passed by referendum, we think it is important to monitor developments on both continually. Both Bylaw 4201 and 4202 authorized new CVRD taxes and we believe the use of these taxpayers funds needs to watched very closely.
“CVRD Bylaw No. 4201 – Cowichan Housing Association Annual Financial Contribution Service Establishment Bylaw, 2018″, will allow the CVRD to annually requisition up to the greater of $765,000 or an amount equal to the amount that could be raised by a property value tax of $0.04584 per $1,000 of net taxable value of land and improvements within the service area to assist the Cowichan Housing Association with costs associated with providing programs and services related to affordable housing and homelessness prevention in the Cowichan Valley.”
Note that amount raised from taxpayers “to assist the Cowichan Housing Association with costs associated with providing programs and services related to affordable housing and homelessness prevention in the Cowichan Valley” can be “up to the greater of $765,000 or an amount equal to the amount that could be raised by a property value tax of $0.04584 per $1,000 of net taxable value of land and improvements…”
So it could be $765,000/year, or it could be more than $765,000/year, paid annually to the Cowichan Housing Association by taxpayers.
Note also that the “programs and services related to affordable housing and homelessness prevention in the Cowichan Valley” are not defined in the Bylaw. This is one of the primary reasons we voted No on this referendum question. We did not deem it prudent to vote Yes without specific details of the program being provided to voters beforehand.
We will monitoring the CVRD and the Cowichan Housing Association use of these taxpayer funds very closely in the upcoming years. There will be more posts about this in future
We came across this video posted to YouTube in 2017 by Michelle Staples, who was elected Mayor of Duncan on 20 October 2018.
This video was apparently made by Social Planning Cowichan, of which Michelle Staples was then Executive Director, and the Cowichan Housing Association, an offshoot of Social Planning Cowichan which is to be given $765,000/year, or more, of taxpayer funds as a result of the Yes Vote in the recent Referendum on CVRD Bylaw 4201.
Just for your information, here are some other videos which appear on Michelle Staples’ YouTube channel:
This is a short election video with music taken from the chorus of a 1990s hit called Tubthumping by a British band called Chumbawamba. If I recall correctly the rest of the song is about drowning one’s problems through binge drinking.
Here’s a video of the full Chumbawamba song:
Would you like to leave a comment or question about anything on this post?